"To preserve the reputation of the Fraternity unsullied must be your constant care."


Saturday, March 05, 2016

The Tomb of King Hiram of Tyre

I received a note from a Freemason in France last week, alerting me that the supposed historic burial tomb of Hiram, King of Tyre, located in modern day Lebanon, is sorely in need of repair. Until his message, I had no idea that the tomb even existed, so it came as quite a surprise. The Brother says that there has been some preliminary talk of trying to raise money to hire qualified stonemasons to restore the site.

I found this description on the website of Methven Lodge No. 51 in Methven, New Zealand:

Hiram King of Tyre, Tomb from about 950 BC. 
Positioned alongside a Road near Hanaway just a few minutes SE of Tyre.
The Tomb of King Hiram is located a couple minutes drive Southeast of Tyre in the village of Hanaway.  It is a colossal limestone sarcophagus built upon a high pedestal, just north of the border with Israel.  This Tomb can be found and seen on Google Maps with a brown tourist pointer sign on the road nearby.  The following is a brief researched report of King Hiram. 
King Hiram of Tyre is a significant character in Craft Masonry. He is introduced into Masonry as a friend and ally of King Solomon who assists the latter in building the famous House of God in Jerusalem. What isn’t as widely known is that he was also an ally of King David, Solomon’s father, and assisted him in the building of his palace in Jerusalem. Tyre is an ancient Phoenician seaport and is located in what is now known as Lebanon and is currently known as Sur. It was from Lebanon the famous cedar found in both David’s palace and King Solomon’s temple came from. Aside from supplies, King Hiram was known for supplying artisans, woodsmen, carpenters, stone masons, and other such workers to assist in the building of various famous edifices as Tyre was a well-known center for architects and artificers. 
King Hiram was a Phoenician King who reigned from around 980 to 947 BC (although this date may vary by 10-years).  He is said to have lived to be 53-years of age, but reigned only 34 of them having taken the throne after his father Abibaal passed and was succeeded by his son Baal-Eser.  Although there exists some confusion from Biblical text as the timelines don’t quite match up as Solomon and David deal with a “King Hiram” for a time of around 54-years.

I did some more looking and came across an article on the Livius.org website that questions the claim that this is, in fact, King Hiram I's tomb. It says, in part:

Although named after the legendary king Hiram, who may have reigned Tyre in the tenth century BCE, this tomb, which can be found near Hannaouiye (some six kilometers southeast of Tyre along the road to Qana), in fact dates to the Persian age (i.e. 539-332 BCE). There is some typological similarity to the tombs at Pasargadae and Gur-e Dokhtar. There are several Byzantine tombs in the neighborhood. 


  1. 1)King Hiram cannot be Hiram Abiff.
    2)Hiram Abiff the architect of Solomon's Temple was murdered. His killers fled across the Red Sea. Masonic lore.
    Note. They fled across the Red Sea because the Bible came from West Arabia or Yemen. Solomon's Temple had to have been in West Arabia. There is a gold mine there. Cedars from Lebanon? That's a long way. The Book of Genesis refers to camels. No camels in ancient Israel, only Arabia. No Pharaohs in Egypt but Faroahs? from Mizraim, Yemen

  2. Nobody said King Hiram of Tyre was Hiram Abiff, or that Hiram Abiff existed outside of Masonic legend. What's your point?

    And no, Solomon's Temple was on the Temple Mount, not in Arabia, and archeological findings from the First Temple Period confirm it. You've been reading propaganda from the Waqf.

  3. You can read a description of the tomb in Rob Morris's book "Freemasonry in the Holly-land" from his visit over 100 years ago. (Page 102)
    Already then it was in bad shape.



Comments will not appear immediately, so be patient. I am forced to laboriously screen every post because I am constantly bombarded with spam. Anonymous postings on Masonic topics have the same status as cowans and eavesdroppers as far as I am concerned. If you post with an unknown or anonymous account, do not expect to see your comment appear.