Ever since November 2012, the Grand Lodge of Arkansas F&AM has forbidden the Masons in its jurisdiction to be members of the Shrine. The Grand Master at that time, Robert L. Jackson, issued a letter that declared the Shrine "clandestine" in Arkansas, and all Masons in the state were immediately ordered to either quit their Shrine membership, or "self-expel" themselves from Masonry (i.e. Quit).
"An affiliated organization, while still not fraternal, carries with it a significant increase in status and trust. An affiliated organization is more formally connected to the larger fraternal, governing body and signals that the shrine in Arkansas is no longer operating loosely on its own, but is more connected to the Masonic fraternity through its mission, values, and structure. While progress has been made, I also believe this shall be the last act of good faith given by the Grand Lodge of, Arkansas toward this shrine in Arkansas until ALL non-Mason Shriners's are Freemasons."
(If you don't understand about relationships between Masonic groups and why membership status affects them across the board, see the explanation below about why this is an issue in the first place.)The result was an enormous drop in Masonic membership in Arkansas that far exceeded the comparative membership losses that any other Masonic jurisdiction has suffered in the U.S. The sheer number of expulsions in Arkansas between about 2013 and 2019 was staggering.
Jackson's order might have meant the end of the only two Shrines in Arkansas (Scimitar Shriners and Sahara Shriners). Because of the untenable situation in which they found themselves, Shriners International changed its bylaws and carved out a loophole only for Arkansas that permitted non-Masons to become Shriners there. That by-law change has been in place since 2013.
Meanwhile, PGM Robert Jackson went on to become the Grand Secretary of Arkansas in 2016. Numerous Arkansas Masons reported that his office allegedly stopped issuing letters of good standing to fleeing Arkansas Masons who attempted to transfer their membership to jurisdictions in other states like Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, and elsewhere in protest. The Grand Lodges of Oklahoma and Kansas both withdrew amity with Arkansas, partially over these issues.
Jackson was suspended in 2017 by then-GM Carl E. Nelson, along with Grand Treasurer, PGM Ronnie Hedge.
But a new wrinkle developed in 2019. The outgoing 2018-19 Grand Master Bradley Phillips issued a Grand Master's Recommendation at the 2019 Arkansas annual meeting that proposed a way to end to the needless impasse with the Shrine. It reclassified the Shrine in Arkansas from a clandestine organization to a civic one for the next three years; permitted non-Mason Arkansas Shriners to petition lodges and self-expelled Arkansas Masons to petition for reinstatement, along with all other Masons in the state who had previously been expelled by former Grand Masters or trial commissions over their Shrine memberships or activities. At the end of three years, if all members of Arkansas Shrines had become Masons in that state (or in another jurisdiction recognized by Arkansas) once again, the Shrine would be classified as a fully recognized fraternal organization under Arkansas Masonic code. All remaining Shriners in Arkansas who had NOT become Masons by the end of the three year period were to be suspended by the Shrine, and the non-Mason loophole created by this whole imbroglio by the Shrine would be ended.
Fast-forward to today. Private informal meetings have been held in recent months between leaders to attempt to find a solution that would finally bring the Shrine back into Arkansas' Masonic fold while addressing the problem of these new non-Masonic Shriners. Lampirez' last sentence makes it clear, however, that this is as far as the Grand Lodge will extend the olive branch until the Shriners can figure out how to make all of the non-Masons who joined the Shrine over the last fourteen years join a Masonic Lodge. Hopefully, they haven't built a box they can't escape from, and I suspect Tampa will get involved now that this edict has been issued.
For readers who do not understand the connection between the two groups, it needs to be explained that all those guys wearing red fezzes in Shriners Hospitals ads, or marching and puttering around in little race cars in parades are all members of a local Shriners organization AS WELL AS a Freemason’s lodge. Everywhere else in the world outside of Arkansas, Shriners International requires men to first join a local Masonic lodge and undergo the three initiation degree ceremonies before they are allowed to then petition the Shriners for membership. Further, almost all regular, recognized grand lodges have rules that say if a man is dropped from Masonic membership for any reason - voluntarily or otherwise - he must also resign from all Masonically related, appendant or concordant organizations. If he doesn’t, that group’s administration is supposed to suspend or expel him to comply with Masonic regulations (informally referred to as the "suspended in one, suspended in all" doctrine).
Unlike state-wide grand lodges we have throughout the US, Canada and Mexico, the Shriners don't have state administrations. Local Shrine clubs and Shrine centers must answer to their national leadership in Tampa, Florida, which is also responsible for the 22 children's hospitals located in North America.

In Michigan we had a Potentate expelled from Masonry. Imperial allowed him to continue on as Potentate for the ensuing term. This lead to some rocky relations between the two organizations. Thankfully all is well, but the craft suffered for a few years as a result.
ReplyDeleteBlack eyes like this continue to be given to Freemasonry ... especially when it concerns an organization of Shriners that exists to promote the most valuable lessons of Freemasonry, charity. Sad it took 14 years in order to reconcile ... it's little wonder why the Craft has declined by over 55% in just the last 15 years alone. All this infighting coming from the Grand Lodges themselves creates more rift than are needed. I used to think that creating a national body to govern the 51 Grand Lodges that exist would be a good idea - but I can only see that leading to further discontent if we can't even get along jurisdictionally.
ReplyDeleteA national or international governing body scares me.
DeleteDarn good information, Chris. Educational and timely too as there is a big effort by Shriner leadership this year to increase awareness and membership.
ReplyDeleteIn other news, Switzerland's most historic Masonic lodge (in Zürich) suffered severe damage in a suspicious fire earlier in the year - still being investigated:
ReplyDeletehttps://freimaurermuseum.ch/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE4NSwiMmY1MmZjMzY0YTQyIiwwLDAsMzY0LDFd
Thanks for this. I hadn't seen it.
Delete"if a man is dropped from Masonic membership for any reason - voluntarily or otherwise - he must also resign from all Masonically related, appendant or concordant organizations"
ReplyDeletesure, and if you were a member of only one jurisdiction, that would make sense.
but if someone is a member of say, a New York lodge and a Tennessee lodge, and then Tennessee decides to expel him for practicing his religion, is he then obliged to resign from masonically-related organizations in New York, or others which are not specifically Tennessee organizations?
how much is New York and others required to be dragged around?
This is why there are still some grand lodges in the US and throughout the world (including most Prince Hall grand lodges) that prohibit holding Masonic membership in more than one jurisdiction. I believe Arkansas is one of these. The line of thinking is that "no man can serve two masters." The conundrum that dual membership creates is precisely this problem.
DeleteLet's say a Mason does something thoroughly egregious in, say, Tennessee, and gets expelled by the fraternity there (I'm not talking about just pissing off a Grand Master, but something truly horrible). He might even do jail time there. But let's say the wheels of Masonic justice grind slowly in New York and that they can't or won't take action against him until his New York lodge tries him. Maybe the final verdict has to wait until their next annual meeting. Or two. Or three. So he's still a New York Mason all this time, despite his status in Tennessee. He still has his Shrine and Grotto and AASR membership. He might even apply to New York for charity (that he needs to pay off his attorney fees in Tennessee).
It's all hypothetical, but you see the issue at hand. This is what multiple grand lodge memberships create. Now, how often does this occur? Not very. And if his expulsion in Tennessee was just a bad personality conflict that got out of hand and he caught a grumpy Grand Master on a bad day who decided that he just wants the guy to get off his own Grand Lodge lawn, then membership in a second (or third or fourth) GL works to this Brother's advantage. His Masonic career isn't completely ruined, just made inconvenient at home.
Meaning, I can argue both sides. We've been through this in my own state of Indiana in recent years. Arkansas was simply following their own (albeit stringent and voluminous) internal rules, and cooler heads didn't prevail for way too long. Hopefully, this will finally be laid to rest sooner than later.