"To preserve the reputation of the Fraternity unsullied must be your constant care."
BE A FREEMASON

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Discrimination Laws and Private Clubs in the US

Freemasons should obviously do what is morally correct. Following the letter of the law rather than the spirit of it is usually the weasel's way of getting around doing the right thing.

That said, back in 2000, Brother Kevin Francart did extensive research on federal and state laws, as regards applying discrimination laws, statutes and decisions to private clubs (especially fraternal organizations). His study, NO DOGS ALLOWED appeared in the Thomas M. Cooley Law Review. The arguments as to whether such laws can be applied to force fraternal groups, like the Freemasons, to admit people their members want kept out center around the right to freely associate or NOT to associate with others, as well as whether an organization is a public accommodation.

See NO DOGS ALLOWED: FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION v. FORCED INCLUSION. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION STATUTES AND THEIR APPLICABILITY TO PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS

My purpose in posting this information has to do with uninformed sabre-rattling about how the law might or might not be used to compel grand lodges that are reputedly racist in practice to knuckle under to civil rights regulations. The truth is, they probably can't.

All of this fails to recognize that Freemasons are supposed to regard our brothers on the level. That's not supposed to be a theory. And it isn't just lofty sounding platitudes. We shouldn't even be having a conversation about how to compel grand lodges to end institutional racism, because as Masons, it shouldn't have existed in the first place. And it sure as hell shouldn't exist anywhere today.
at

2 comments:

  1. simon laplaceWed Jul 01, 07:33:00 PM 2009

    Efforts to induce a GL to do something are the same efforts that tried to induce a GL NOT to do something. Those efforts failed in 1989 when the GL of CT recognized Prince Hall. The next issue of Connecticut Freemasons will detail those negative efforts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mark Koltko-RiveraMon Jul 27, 04:59:00 PM 2009

    Speaking as a former sabre-rattler myself, I appreciate your going to the trouble of finding and posting this information.

    Yes, I fully agree that the better way to eliminate racism in Freemasonry is through appealing to our higher ideals.

    But then the issue arises: what about when that doesn't work?

    ReplyDelete

ATTENTION!
SIGN YOUR NAME OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFY YOURSELF IN YOUR COMMENT POSTS IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A GOOGLE ACCOUNT.
Your comments will not appear immediately because I am forced to laboriously screen every post. I'm constantly bombarded with spam. Depending on the comments being made, anonymous postings on Masonic topics may be regarded with the same status as cowans and eavesdroppers, as far as I am concerned. If you post with an unknown or anonymous account, do not automatically expect to see your comment appear.